
Sparked by the 2001 National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI),
the U.S. multi-agency R&D program is getting top billing
in the global scientific community. The national
movement to advance this tiny technology is on stage and
in the spotlight as the international community
observes.
“The U.S. is one of the very few countries taking the
lead in nano technology research,” said Roger
Stewart, HDR senior vice president. “The U.S. government
has come forth with tremendous funding and support for
this growing science, putting the U.S. on the cutting
edge. The rest of the world is very interested in how
we’re doing nanotechnology research, as well as
building the research infrastructure to support the
science.”
 |
| View from the street between NPL
module 2 and 12 from the connecting bridge |
The Department of Energy (DOE) model exemplifies the
U.S. government’s heavy investment in new user
facilities, with five state-of-the-art nanotechnology
labs now in various stages of development around the
country, according to Ahmad Soueid, HDR senior vice
president and principal for nanotechnology. Researchers
are invited to submit proposals to conduct research at
government-run user facilities. These facilities are
available for free if their proposal is accepted and
they publish their research results.

Scientific criteria of most
significance to the building design.
“Having the opportunity to work in one of these large,
well-funded labs, scientists can perform leading-edge
research in facilities specially designed to offer
extreme control of temperature, humidity, vibration, and
electromagnetics,” Soueid said. For other countries, the
concept of a laboratory without dedicated scientists is
somewhat unusual.
The U.S. has the added advantage of more venture capital
flow and companies willing to invest in potentially
blockbuster scientific developments, Soueid said.
The European Scene
According to HDR’s Bea Sennewald, who heads the
company’s London office, Europe tends to have smaller,
less unified nanotechnology communities due to funding
and the political structure of the European Union (E.U.)
“Because the U.S. is a single country, it seems much
easier to centralize funding for facilities and get
something going,” she said. “U.S. politicians may lobby
for a lab to be built in their state, but this is a much
easier dynamic to work with than countries collaborating
to decide which one will ultimately have a facility
representing the entire E.U. While the E.U. has a large
central fund for supporting research, there is not yet a
central funding source for research facilities
development.”
Currently, each member country is responsible for its
own facilities. For example, France is developing a new
$193 million nanotechnology center in Grenoble, and
several other countries (Spain, Italy, Netherlands, and
Scandinavian countries) are moving toward developing
similar centers, though at a smaller scale, Sennewald
said.
“Without immediate payoff, construction of a
nanotechnology research facility means a country has to
have fairly deep pockets. In the U.K., the Department of
Trade and Industry oversees a £90 million nanotechnology
initiative with half earmarked for facilities, but it is
currently structured to be distributed through several
Regional Development Authorities. This will result in
many smaller projects, rather than one or two shared
central facilities,” she said.
This is not to say that countries outside the U.S. are
missing on the playing field or that the U.S. has a lead
that will last forever. According to Soueid, there is
real concern in Europe that, if left unchallenged, the
U.S. will gain too much advantage and Europeans won’t be
able to catch up. They then could lose some of their
best researchers and potential products to the U.S., he
said.
“Recent years have witnessed a westward migration of
scientists across the Atlantic Ocean,” Soueid said.
“Inadequate facilities and lower pay cause them to look
for better career opportunities in the United States.
Many of the academic post-doctoral positions in the U.S.
are filled with foreign scientists as Americans turn
away from such positions in favor of more lucrative
industry-based jobs.”
As a result of this growing concern, there is a great
deal of effort underway in the E.U. to build
collaboration between countries to do the research and
to establish funding for the necessary infrastructure.
“Having the
opportunity to work in one of these large,
well-funded labs, scientists can perform
leading-edge research in facilities specially
designed to offer extreme control of temperature,
humidity, vibration, and electromagnetics.”
— Ahmad Soueid, Senior Vice
President
and Principal for Nanotechnology |
Big Things Come in Big Labs
With the centralization of resources into a few major
labs, the U.S. has the opportunity to develop larger
labs with environmental controls and instrumentation
found nowhere else, Soueid noted.
The $235 million Advanced Measurement Laboratory (AML)
at the National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST) is the prime example. Recently finished, this lab
is “the most environmentally stable lab in the world,”
having specially designed critical spaces with
temperature controlled to 0.01 degrees Celsius and
vibration criteria requiring a velocity of 0.75µm/s for
frequencies between 5 and 100 Hz.” Soueid said. (See
information on the new AML.)
“Because of the groundbreaking facility innovations
accomplished at NIST, many other countries benchmark
NIST and seek advice before beginning their facilities,”
Soueid said. One such example is the U.K.’s National
Physical Laboratory (NPL) in Teddington, Middlesex.
Another is the University of Alberta’s National
Institute for Nano¬ technology in Canada. Others are the
national labs of Mexico, Finland and The Netherlands.
From Research to Commercialization
The U.S. NNI is focused on bringing nanotechnology
research to fruit by producing viable commercial
products. Some products employing nanotechnology are in
the marketplace now. However, according to the
National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (NNCO), in
its Supplement to the President’s FY 2004 Budget,
understanding of the properties of nanoscale materials
and structures is still at a rudimentary level and
traditional models for explaining material behavior do
not apply at the nanoscale. In order to maximize the
development of future innovations, the NNI has devoted a
significant investment toward basic research to achieve
a fundamental understanding of nanoscale properties and
processes.
The NNCO further says that an important mechanism to
bring about commercialization of nanotechnology is
interaction among industry, academic and government
researchers. This partnering and collaboration is
encouraged by the NNI through the establishment or
support of centers, networks and facilities that are
available to researchers from all scientific sectors.

Grand Challenges Foster Knowledge-Sharing
A part of this mission is realized through NNI’s
sponsorship of topical workshops for the international
community, related to its nine Grand Challenge areas.
(See www.nano.gov/ html/research/nnigc.html) For
example, in January this year, Soueid gave a
presentation at the NNI’s Interagency Workshop on
Instrumentation and Metrology. More than 200
metrologists from around the world attended, he said.
“Through these workshops, information exchange enables
us to envision the future of measurements for buildings,
a sort of ‘crystal ball’ with a focus on facilities,” he
said.
The NNI held its third annual “From Vision to
Commercialization” conference March 31 - April 2, 2004,
in Washington, D.C. At that three day event, Dr. Mihail
C. Roco, senior advisor for nanotechnology with the
National Science Foundation, indicated that future NNI
conferences will include even more international
invitees than in the past, Soueid said.

|